Jump to page content Jump to navigation

College Board

AP Central

AP Exam Reader
Siemens Awards for Advanced Placement

APAC 2010
Print Page
Home > AP Courses and Exams > Course Home Pages > Calculus at the Battle of Trafalgar

Calculus at the Battle of Trafalgar

by Dan Teague
The North Carolina School of Science and Mathematics
Durham, North Carolina

Calculating a Strategy
The summer of 2005 marked the 200th anniversary of the British naval victory over a combined French and Spanish fleet in the waters off Cape Trafalgar. During the Napoleonic wars, naval warfare followed certain rules that seem rather formal to us today. The ships in each fleet lined up in a row, sailing parallel to their opponents and firing as they sailed past each other (see figure). They repeated this maneuver until one fleet disabled or sank the other. This is known as the directed fire model or conventional combat model.

Figure: The White Fleet takes a beating. Image courtesy of the author.

In such an engagement, the fleet with superior firepower will inevitably win. To represent this battle, we begin with a system of differential equations that models the interaction of two fleets in combat. Suppose we have two opposing forces, fleet A with  ships and fleet B with   ships initially, and   and   ships at t units of time after the battle is engaged. Given the style of combat at the time of Trafalgar, the losses for each fleet will be proportional to the effective firepower of the opposing fleet. That is,

  and 

where a and b are positive constants that measure the effectiveness of the ship's cannonry and personnel, and A and B are both functions of time. These equations indicate that the rate at which one navy loses ships depends on only two things: the number of ships in the opposing fleet and the effectiveness of the opposition fire. Assume that the effectiveness does not change throughout the battle so that the rate at which a navy loses ships is proportional to the number of ships in the opposing fleet.

The Questions for Battle

1. Assume that   (the two fleets are equal in battle), and show that the total number of ships still fighting is decreasing exponentially by considering  .

2. Assume that  , and show that the difference in the size of the two fleets is increasing exponentially by considering  .

3. Use the results from questions (1) and (2) to solve for A and B as functions of time.

4. If  , you can't use the techniques in questions (1) and (2) to determine the number of ships in each fleet as a function of time. If    and  , find  , substitute, and solve for  . You will have two solutions to the second-order differential equation. The general solution will be the sum of these solutions. Use this solution to find  . Ensure that the solutions to question (3) are special cases of this more general solution.

5. If   and  , find  and solve for A in terms of B. This equation will give you the expected number of ships remaining in fleet A when  .

6. The commander of the British fleet was Admiral Nelson. In the now famous Battle of Trafalgar, he exhibited cunning military strategy. In one account of the battle, Nelson expected to have 27 ships in the British fleet (B) and predicted that the French/Spanish Armada (A) would have 34 ships. In planning his strategy, Nelson believed that the British fleet was better prepared (and better led) than the French/Spanish Armada. Suppose that  .

If Nelson's 27 ships fought a conventional battle against the 34 ships in the French/Spanish Armada with  , would he win? How many ships would remain in the winning fleet?

7. Instead of sailing parallel to the French/Spanish fleet, Nelson planned to sail through the middle of the fleet, cutting it in half and fighting two separate conventional battles. In one battle, he would have numerical superiority and consequently win that battle. In the other, he would have fewer ships and lose. But, with the ships that remained in the battle that he had won, would he be able to defeat the ships remaining in the French/Spanish fleet in the battle that they won? In a third and decisive battle, the British fleet would be victorious. Note that Nelson assigned himself the task of leading the portion of his fleet expected to lose its battle.

Show, using the results from question (5), how Nelson could arrange his 27 ships to defeat a larger fleet of 34 ships using a three-battle plan as described above with  . According to our model, how many ships would we expect to survive the final battle?

Solutions
Answer the questions in full before viewing the Solutions and Commentary.

References
Bartkovich, Kevin, et al. Contemporary Calculus Through Applications. Providence, Rhode Island: Janson Publications, 1995.

Bonder, Seth. "Mathematical Modeling of Military Conflict Situations." In Proceedings of Symposia in Applied Mathematics, edited by Saul Gass. Vol. 25, Operations ResearchMathematics and Models. Providence, Rhode Island: American Mathematical Society, 1981.

Coleman, Courtney S. "Combat Models." In Modules in Applied Mathematics, edited by William Lucas. Vol. 1, Differential Equation Models, edited by Martin Braun, Courtney Coleman, and Donald Drew. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1983.



  ABOUT MY AP CENTRAL
    Course and Email Newsletter Preferences
  AP COURSES AND EXAMS
    Course Home Pages
    Course Descriptions
    The Course Audit
    Sample Syllabi
    Teachers' Resources
    Exam Calendar and Fees
    Exam Questions
    FAQs
  PRE-AP
    Teachers' Corner
    Workshops
  AP COMMUNITY
    About Electronic Discussion Groups
    Become an AP Exam Reader

Back to top