|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
Exams: 2005 Studio Art 2-D Design: Quality Samples
|
|
| |
2-D Design: Quality -- Section I
The student works displayed on this page are reproductions of actual works submitted by students in June 2005.
All of the samples here were chosen because they clearly represent different points on the scoring scale for Section I, Quality. In the course of the AP evaluation, each section of the portfolio is scored on a six-point scale. Once the evaluation is complete, the various scores assigned to each student's portfolio are combined and transformed into the final AP grade of 1-5. The requirement for Section I of all three Studio Art portfolios is five pieces.
Each group of five works is accompanied by a brief rationale for the scores awarded to the works. We greatly appreciate the generosity of the students who have agreed to share their works in this way.
Click on each image to view a larger version.
Portfolio 1: Katherine Devereux, Pensacola High School, Pensacola, FL
Score: 6
In this series of photographs, there is evidence of a confident personal voice; it resonates both in the student's choice of subject matter and the approach to creating dynamic emphasis in the various compositions. The student uses point of view to highlight unique approaches to creating strong contrast and directionality. The use of digital software is deliberate and underscores investigation into the surface qualities.
Portfolio 2: So Yeong Park, Centreville High School, Clifton, VA
Score: 5
As a 2-D portfolio experimentation in composition, this series of works offers the exploration of a variety of design principles. The choice of media is distinctive and serves as a means to explore what is possible with regard to color. The pencil drawing engages the viewer through repetitive devices within the rendering of the patterned cloth. While the portraits may not be fully resolved, they accomplish some expressive qualities.
Portfolio 3: Jason Yang, Taipei American School, Taipei, Taiwan
Score: 4
Most of these compositions engage the viewer with an exciting futuristic approach to creating digital compositions. The metallic images make some connection with our expectations and vision for technology. In contrast, the watercolor seems unresolved and leaves the impression that this particular work may not have received the same level of artistic development.
Portfolio 4: Yvonne E. Medina, Walter Payton Coll Prep School, Chicago, IL
Score: 3
This series of works offers both abstract representation and imagery of flowers. In utilizing a range of materials, the technical aspects have not been fully achieved. The institution of the elements of art, including color and shape, seems awkward and out of sync in attempting to get at the principles of design. The student's voice is not discernible.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Course Home Pages